Addressing Egregious Misconduct: The Perjuring Plaintiff
نویسنده
چکیده
Jonathan M. Stern is Chair of the DRI Aerospace Law Committee. He practices aerospace and insurance coverage law with Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, where he is resident in the Firm’s Washington, DC, office. Mr. Stern, who holds FAA-issued commercial pilot, control tower operator, and ground instructor certificates, was formerly an air traffic controller at Washington National Airport and a flight instructor. Addressing Egregious Misconduct
منابع مشابه
Ethical publishing: the innocent author's guide to avoiding misconduct.
Publication misconduct includes a range of unethical behaviours, such as plagiarism, breach of confidence and in appropriate authorship. The most egregious cases are easy to recognize and widely condemned, but the gradient between normal and unethical behaviour is often a gradual one. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of the full spectrum of publication misconduct and understand that s...
متن کاملScientific Misconduct.
Scientific misconduct has been defined as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Scientific misconduct has occurred throughout the history of science. The US government began to take systematic interest in such misconduct in the 1980s. Since then, a number of studies have examined how frequently individual scientists have observed scientific misconduct or were involved in it. Although the ...
متن کاملSentence Reduction as a Remedy for Prosecutorial Misconduct
Current remedies for prosecutorial misconduct, such as reversal of conviction or dismissal of charges, are rarely granted by courts and thus do not deter prosecutors effectively. Further, such all-or-nothing remedial schemes are often problematic from corrective and expressive perspectives, especially when misconduct has not affected the trial verdict. When granted, such remedies produce windfa...
متن کاملAlternative Burdens May Come With Alternative Causes
Law360, New York (October 17, 2012) -A fundamental issue in many toxic tort cases is whether a plaintiff’s personal injuries were caused by something other than the defendant’s alleged misconduct. Defendants often raise this question in several ways — did the plaintiff’s causation expert properly consider potential alternative causes in reaching the offered opinion? Did the plaintiff meet his o...
متن کاملPolicies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-Income Countries
David Resnik and Zubin Master review current policies and initiatives for preventing and managing research misconduct in high-income countries, summarize some high profile cases of misconduct, and make suggestions on ways forward.
متن کامل